Kushal Samant Architects

Reveals internal circulation and structural framing through a longitudinal section

• Primary volume defined by a continuous roof plane with intersecting pitches
• Secondary volume accessed via a stepped entry sequence along the eastern facade

• Interior voids demarcated by vertical partitions and stair risers

• Emphasis on vertical articulation through contrasting materiality
• Spatial hierarchy established by elevation and depth of cut

The diagram establishes a clear vertical progression from ground level to upper plane, mediated by the stair sequence. The roof’s intersecting planes create distinct spatial zones, each defined by its relationship to the structural frame. Material contrast between the opaque mass and the open voids reinforces the spatial hierarchy. The cut reveals how circulation defines the spatial experience rather than merely serving as a transition. The diagram’s logic prioritizes the spatial sequence over formal ornamentation, grounding the design in functional clarity.

Defines the building’s longitudinal section through its structural and spatial organization

• Primary volume enclosed by continuous wall and roof plane
• Secondary volume defined by stepped platform and central stair

• Ground plane differentiated by contrasting mass and elevation

• Emphasis on vertical articulation through stepped transitions
• Spatial hierarchy established by material contrast and scale variation

The diagram establishes a clear progression from the solid base to the open upper levels, where the central stair acts as a vertical anchor. The stepped platform creates a threshold that separates the lower and upper zones while maintaining visual continuity. The roof’s single plane unifies the two volumes despite their differing elevations, reinforcing a cohesive spatial logic. Material differentiation at the base grounds the structure, while the upper sections suggest permeability and access. The spatial relationships are resolved through precise alignment and proportional contrast, eliminating ambiguity in the sequence of movement.

Defines spatial organization through nested volumetric relationships

• Central courtyard enclosed by stepped terraces
• Perimeter circulation defined by continuous wall mass

• Interior rooms arranged in asymmetrically offset clusters

• Emphasizes axial alignment between core and peripheral zones
• Uses void-to-mass ratio to establish spatial hierarchy

The diagram positions the central courtyard as the primary spatial anchor, its stepped terraces creating a vertical sequence that directs movement toward the core. Peripheral rooms are distributed asymmetrically to disrupt uniformity while maintaining access to the central void. The continuous wall mass frames the entire composition, establishing a boundary that contains yet contrasts with the internal fragmentation. Spatial hierarchy emerges from the scale and placement of voids, where the central space dominates through its openness and centrality. The diagram’s logic relies on the interplay between contained volumes and open thresholds to define circulation and enclosure.

Organizes spatial hierarchy through concentric enclosure and peripheral circulation.

• Central square defines primary activity zone—
• Peripheral corridors establish secondary circulation—
• Outer boundary frames the entire spatial envelope—

Diagram explores nested volumes as organizational devices— Diagram implies directional flow through spatial contraction and expansion—

The central square acts as a spatial anchor, drawing circulation inward through progressively narrower corridors that articulate zones of varying intimacy. Peripheral rooms are arranged asymmetrically, suggesting functional differentiation without disrupting the overall square plan. The concentric framing of the core creates a sense of enclosure that contrasts with the open perimeter, reinforcing a hierarchy between public and private realms. Spatial logic is derived from the interplay of nested boundaries, where each layer modifies the experience of movement and presence. The diagram’s structure implies a sequence of spatial thresholds that govern access and perception, establishing a clear architectural grammar through geometric constraint.

Defines spatial organization through axial alignment and nested enclosure

• Central courtyard as primary spatial anchor
• Peripheral corridors establishing secondary circulation

• Enclosed rooms defining tertiary functional zones

• Emphasis on orthogonal hierarchy
• Use of void to articulate spatial priority

The central courtyard acts as the dominant spatial node, drawing circulation through its axial alignment with adjacent corridors. Enclosed rooms are positioned to maintain visual and physical separation while remaining accessible via defined pathways. The diagram suggests a hierarchy where the courtyard’s openness contrasts with the compartmentalized nature of the periphery. Spatial relationships are governed by linear progression rather than radial dispersion, reinforcing a structured, non-random arrangement. The architecture implies a sequence of movement that privileges the central void as the destination or point of orientation.

Reveals vertical circulation and spatial articulation through structural framing

• Primary circulation path defined by stair sequence and vertical voids
• Interior volume organized by grid-based floor plates and columnar supports

• Exterior envelope articulated by vertical fins and continuous glazing

• Structural frame acts as both spatial divider and visual anchor
• Material contrast between opaque mass and transparent plane establishes hierarchy

The diagram exposes how circulation and structure interpenetrate to define spatial sequence — the stair sequence establishes vertical priority while the grid floor plates anchor horizontal logic. Column placement reinforces structural logic without interrupting flow, allowing spatial continuity across levels. The vertical fins introduce rhythm while demarcating private from public zones — their density correlates with spatial intensity. The transparency of the glazing plane permits visual permeability without sacrificing structural integrity — a balance maintained through consistent framing intervals.

Illustrates structural and spatial organization through a cutaway axonometric view

• Ground-level platform supporting primary volume — elevated by columns
• Upper floor with grid-patterned ceiling and defined interior zones

• Vertical circulation tower with staircases and service shafts

• Emphasizes separation of public and private through spatial layering
• Reveals structural logic by exposing load-bearing elements and spatial articulation

The diagram establishes a clear vertical hierarchy, with the ground plane anchoring the structure while the upper volume floats above it. The circulation tower acts as a vertical spine, organizing movement and service functions without interrupting the main plan. Interior spaces are demarcated by structural frames and partitions, suggesting a modular logic that supports both privacy and circulation. The elevation of the main mass creates a visual and physical separation from the ground, reinforcing the building’s identity as a distinct architectural object.

Schematic elevation revealing vertical circulation and spatial articulation

• Upper floor assembly with segmented fenestration and interior partitioning
• Ground-level support structure with columnar voids and shaded ground plane

• Vertical circulation core with stair placement and alternating wall treatments

• Layered spatial hierarchy through elevation segmentation
• Material contrast defining interior versus exterior zones

The diagram establishes a clear vertical progression, with the upper floor’s segmented openings suggesting varied interior functions while the ground plane’s columnar voids create a sense of openness and spatial release. The circulation core, positioned asymmetrically, introduces a vertical rhythm that contrasts with the horizontal plane of the ground floor. The treatment of the facade — alternating solid and perforated sections — implies a modulation of light and privacy, reinforcing the building’s internal zoning. The diagram’s spatial logic prioritizes circulation as a structural and experiential anchor, while the ground plane’s shaded treatment suggests environmental adaptation.

Diagram establishes structural hierarchy through elevation and plan integration

• Upper volume defined by grid-aligned fenestration and recessed roof elements
• Lower podium supports upper mass via discrete columns and open ground plane

• Vertical circulation implied by recessed stairwell and columnar voids

• Framing system exposes structural logic through column grid and load-bearing walls
• Spatial hierarchy prioritizes upper volume as primary enclosure, lower level as transitional support

The diagram articulates a clear separation between the primary habitable mass and its structural base, where the upper volume’s grid defines interior organization while the lower podium acts as a spatial and structural mediator. Column placement creates rhythmic intervals that anchor the building to the ground plane without obscuring the upper volume’s integrity. The recessed stairwell and columnar voids suggest vertical movement while maintaining a coherent massing strategy. The diagram’s logic prioritizes structural clarity over decorative articulation, with spatial relationships dictated by the column grid and the upper volume’s enclosed form.

Defines a vertical spatial boundary with internal grid modulation

• Upper section contains fragmented, stepped planar divisions
• Central region presents uniform grid alignment with consistent spacing

• Lower portion remains unbroken and aligned with the full height boundary

• Introduces a formalized system of spatial partitioning
• Establishes a vertical hierarchy through incremental reduction in grid density

The diagram organizes space through a progressive reduction in planar complexity, beginning with a fragmented upper zone that suggests programmatic differentiation. The central region maintains a uniform grid, implying a standardized functional or structural layer. The lower section’s unbroken continuity suggests a foundational or unaltered spatial condition. The vertical alignment of grid lines reinforces a consistent dimensional logic across all zones. The stepped discontinuity at the top introduces a deliberate spatial interruption, indicating a transition or threshold.

Diagram reveals spatial organization through layered sectional cut and plan integration.

• Primary volume defined by continuous perimeter and internal partitioning.
• Secondary space formed by stepped intervention and elevated platform.
• Tertiary zone established by recessed void and columnar support.

— Diagram employs layered section to expose spatial stratification. — Spatial hierarchy implied through depth, elevation, and partitioning.

The plan’s internal divisions suggest a sequence of uses, each contained by distinct thresholds. The stepped volume introduces a vertical transition that disrupts the horizontal plane without severing circulation. Columnar supports anchor the structure while allowing the upper level to float visually. The recessed void serves as a spatial pause, creating a perceptual shift between adjacent zones. The diagram’s logic relies on the interplay of containment and release, where each spatial element both defines and responds to its neighbor.

Clarifies volumetric organization and circulation through axonometric representation

• Primary volume defined by raised platform and columnar support system
• Interior space partitioned into distinct functional zones with clear circulation paths

• Exterior envelope articulated by vertical slat system and roof edge treatment

• Emphasis on structural expression through exposed supports
• Spatial hierarchy established by elevation and planar segmentation

The diagram establishes a clear separation between the structural base and the habitable volume, with the columnar supports creating a rhythmic grid that anchors the form. The interior divisions suggest a progression from public to private zones, reinforced by the spatial sequencing of circulation. The vertical slat system acts as both a skin and a spatial filter, modulating light and defining the building’s boundary. The elevation of the volume above ground introduces a deliberate spatial threshold, emphasizing the building’s relationship to the surrounding terrain. The diagram’s logic prioritizes clarity of function over ornament, using form to articulate programmatic intent.

Organizes spatial program through a vertical grid system

• Upper zone contains a compact, vertically oriented circulation core
• Middle section defines a sequence of interconnected service and private rooms

• Lower portion allocates a large, open-plan living area with defined furniture zones

• Emphasizes vertical stacking over horizontal expansion
• Uses grid alignment to establish modular spatial relationships

The diagram presents a clear hierarchy of functions, with circulation and service areas concentrated in the upper half, while the lower half accommodates larger, more flexible living spaces. The vertical stacking creates a sense of enclosure and containment for private functions, while the lower zone’s openness suggests social interaction. Spatial transitions are mediated through narrow corridors and threshold zones that define movement between distinct programmatic realms. The grid structure imposes a consistent spatial rhythm, reinforcing the logic of modularity and scalability. The arrangement suggests a deliberate prioritization of vertical efficiency over horizontal sprawl, aligning spatial organization with structural and functional constraints.

Serves as a spatial cross-section revealing internal organization through layered transparency.

• Primary circulation path defined by a central axis.
• Service zone located adjacent to the rear wall.

• Seating area positioned at the far end, oriented toward the entrance.

• Emphasizes separation through material contrast.
• Uses grid overlay to imply modular spatial division.

The diagram establishes a clear hierarchy between circulation, service, and public zones through spatial placement and implied material distinction. The entrance anchors the sequence, directing movement toward the rear seating area while maintaining service functions along the periphery. The grid overlay suggests a modular system governing spatial distribution without visual clutter. The transparency of the section allows for the reading of spatial relationships without obscuring structural or functional boundaries. The layout prioritizes flow and accessibility while maintaining defined functional zones through spatial separation.

Defines vertical section through building mass and structural grid

• Left wing with stacked rectangular volumes—suggests service or storage functions
• Central vertical element—acts as structural or circulation spine

• Right wing with two distinct blocks—implies dual programmatic zones

• Grid as primary spatial regulator—defines scale and alignment
• Black massing as contrast—emphasizes volume and void relationships

The diagram establishes a clear vertical hierarchy through the distribution of massing, with the left wing’s stacked forms suggesting a more contained program, while the right wing’s dual blocks imply differentiated use. The central vertical element functions as a structural and spatial pivot, anchoring the composition and facilitating circulation. The grid imposes a consistent spatial rhythm across the entire section, dictating proportions and aligning all components. The black massing selectively interrupts the grid, reinforcing the architectural logic of volume versus void and establishing a visual and spatial hierarchy.

Defines spatial organization through axial alignment and circulation paths

• Primary circulation corridor bisects the plan, anchoring movement between service and display zones
• Central core contains stacked storage units, creating vertical hierarchy and spatial weight

• Peripheral zones are demarcated by wall thickness and grid alignment, establishing functional separation

• Emphasizes linear flow over radial access — circulation dictates spatial priority
• Uses grid-based partitioning to encode spatial logic — scale and repetition reinforce order

The diagram establishes a clear axial hierarchy where the central corridor governs movement, directing users toward the core storage volume. This core acts as a spatial anchor, its vertical stacking creating a visual and functional center. Peripheral zones are defined by wall thickness and grid alignment, reinforcing functional separation without physical barriers. The plan’s logic prioritizes circulation as the primary spatial generator, with all other elements arranged to support or respond to this flow. The grid system underpins the entire spatial structure, encoding a consistent rhythm that governs both scale and proportion.

Organizes spatial distribution through a grid-based system with defined circulation and functional zones.

• Upper-left zone contains compact, isolated units—likely private offices or storage.
• Central vertical corridor serves as primary circulation, connecting upper and lower levels.

• Lower section features a linear arrangement of uniform modules—suggesting reception or service functions.

• Emphasizes vertical hierarchy through segmented floor plates and contrasting massing.
• Uses grid alignment to establish rhythm and proportion across distinct spatial categories.

The diagram delineates a clear vertical hierarchy where circulation functions as a spine, separating private from public zones. Upper zones are fragmented for individual use, while the lower section is consolidated for collective interaction. The grid structure imposes uniformity across the plan, yet the massing of certain elements introduces deliberate contrast. Spatial relationships are defined by adjacency and separation, with circulation acting as both connector and divider. The diagram’s logic prioritizes efficiency through modular organization and controlled access.